The URL can be used to link to this page

Plat - June 22, 2016 Planning Commission Staff ReportPlanning Commission Staff Report Subject: Lilac Hill Subdivision at 632 Deer Valley Loop Author: Anya Grahn, Historic Preservation Planner Project Number: PL-16-03153 Date: June 22, 2016 Type of Item: Legislative ± Subdivision Summary Recommendations Staff recommends the Planning Commission hold a public hearing for the Lilac Hill Subdivision located at 632 Deer Valley Loop and consider forwarding a positive recommendation to the City Council based on the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Conditions of Approval as found in the draft ordinance. Description Applicant: 632 DVL, LLC represented by Matt Mullin Location: 632 Deer Valley Loop Zoning: Residential Medium (RM) Adjacent Land Uses: Residential²Single family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings Reason for Review: Plat Amendments require Planning Commission review and City Council review and action. Proposal The site known as Lilac Hill Subdivision at 632 Deer Valley Loop consists of all of Government Lot 26 in Section 15, Township 2 South, Range 4 East, Salt Lake Base and Meridian. It was formerly known as the 11th House on the south side of Deer Valley Park City. Background On April 26, 2016, the City received a Subdivision application for the Lilac Hill Subdivision located at 632 Deer Valley Loop; the application was deemed complete on April 28, 2016. The property is in the Residential Medium (RM) District. Its legal description is all of Government Lot 26 in Section 15, Township 2 South, Range 4 East, Salt Lake Base and Meridian; it was formerly known as 11th House on the south side of Deer Valley, Park City. 7KLVVLWHLVOLVWHGRQ3DUN&LW\¶V+LVWRULF6LWHV,QYHQWRU\+6,DQGLVGHVLJQDWHGDVD Significant Site. The house was constructed c.1900 during the Mature Mining Era (1894-1930) by George and Elizabeth Thompson. The early twentieth century Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps show that this site was part of a much denser neighborhood comprised of approximately fourteen (14) structures. Of these, only four (4) structures currently exist. Planning Commission Packet June 22, 2016 Page 29 of 228 This property has had a long history. The house was initially constructed on mining claims, which came to be held by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). At the time of its construction, it consisted of a two-room cottage; however, between 1912-1918, it was expanded to a four-room cottage. Then c.1969, the house was remodeled to what exists today. The property was purchased by William and Juli Bertagnole in 1981 from Harold and Mary Dudley. On May 17, 1999, a fire damaged the rear addition of the structure. The Bertagnoles did not make repairs following the fire. The BLM granted the Bertagnoles a land patent for ownership of the parcel on May 2, 2013 (Exhibit G). On August 21, 2013, the Park City Building Department issued a Notice and Order to Vacate and Demolish the structure due to the fire damage and the dilapidated state of the structure. The Planning Department moved forward with a Determination of 6LJQLILFDQFH'26WRUHYLHZWKHVLWH¶VKLVWRULFGHVLJQDWLRQRQNovember 13, 2013, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) found that the site should remain designated as ³6LJQLILFDQW´RQWKH+LVWRULF6LWHV,QYHQWRU\+6,LQDFFRUGDQFHZLWK/0&-11- $7KH%HUWDJQROHVDSSHDOHGWKH+3%¶VGHFLVLRQWRWKH%RDUGRI$GMXVWPHQW (BOA) on April 15, 2014; however, the BOA remanded it back to the HPB as the applicant had submitted new evidence. The HPB once again found that the site met the FULWHULDIRU³6LJQLILFDQW´RQ0D\7KH%HUWDJQROHVZLWKGUHZWKHLUDSSHDORQ July 9, 2014. The Bertagnoles finalized the sale of the property to its current owner, 632 DVL, LLC in February 2016. On December 2, 2015, the current owner submitted a Historic District Design Review (HDDR) Pre-Application (Pre-app) to discuss renovation options for this historic structure and development opportunities for the site. The applicant has not yet submitted a HDDR application for the improvements, but has chosen to move forward with the plat amendment in order to make future site improvements. Purpose The purpose of the RM District is to: A. Allow continuation of permanent residential and transient housing in original residential Areas of Park City, B. Encourage new Development along an important corridor, that is Compatible with Historic Structures in the surrounding Area, C. Encourage the rehabilitation of existing Historic Structures, D. Encourage Development that provides a transition in Use and scale between the Historic District and the resort Developments, E. Encourage affordable housing, F. Encourage Development that minimizes the number of new driveways Accessing existing thoroughfares and minimizes the visibility of Parking Areas Analysis The proposed Plat Amendment creates one (1) lot of record from the existing legal description. The proposed Plat Amendment combines the property into one (1) lot measuring 14,446 square feet. Planning Commission Packet June 22, 2016 Page 30 of 228 A portion of Deer Valley Loop (64.27 SF) cuts across the northwest corner of the site and the platted Rossie Hill Drive (62.72 SF) across the southeast corner of the property, consuming a total of 127 square feet (SF). The property surrounding this lot is owned by the BLM, but the BLM has granted a right-of-way easement to the City for the streets that cross over the BLM parcel. The portion of 632 Deer Valley Drive that includes the street will be dedicated to the City during this plat amendment, and the street dedication shall be noted on the recorded plat, as reflected in Condition of Approval #3. The portion of the street dedication will reduce the overall lot size to 14,319 square feet and is included on the calculations for footprint below. The property is located outside the Park City Landscaping and Maintenance of Soil Cover Ordinance (Soils Ordinance) and therefore not regulated by the City for mine related impacts. If the property owner does encounter mine waste or mine waste impacted soils they must handle the material in accordance to State and Federal law. Staff has included this as Condition of Approval #7. A single-family dwelling is an allowed use in the RM District. The minimum lot area for a single-family dwelling is 2,812 square feet. The proposed lot meets the minimum lot area for single-family dwellings. The required minimum lot width is 27.50; the proposed lot width is 129.41 feet. The proposed lot meets the minimum lot width requirement. The following table shows applicable Land Management Code (LMC) development parameters in the RM District: Required Existing Permitted Lot size 14,319 SF 1 2,812 square feet minimum Complies Front yard setbacks 35 feet front yard (north property line) 15 feet Complies Rear yard setbacks 52 feet rear yard (Rossie Hill Drive) 10 feet Complies Side yard setbacks 17 feet (west), 65 feet (east) 5 feet, Complies 1 This represents the size of the lot after the street dedication. There is no footprint requirement in the RM District. The only encroachment that exists is a gravel driveway or parking area off of Deer Valley Loop on the northwest corner of the site. No other encroachments, other than the portion of Deer Valley Loop that crosses the property, exist. This area of Park City is designated as Significant on the Historic Sites Inventory (HSI). Any proposed development or work on the historic house will require approval of a Planning Commission Packet June 22, 2016 Page 31 of 228 Historic District Design Review (HDDR) to ensure compliance with the Design Guidelines for Historic Sites in Park City. Staff finds that this site, along with the BLM-property to the northeast that contain the three (3) historic cottages at 555, 560, and 577 Deer Valley contribute to ParN&LW\¶V history and provide a density of historic structures that largely retain their relationship with one another and the hillside. As this area is currently zoned RM, it allows for a much greater density to be added to these sites or larger additions to the historic KRXVHVWKDQZRXOGEHVHHQLQ2OG7RZQ¶V+-districts. Under 15-11-12 of the LMC, Historic District/Site design review is required for all Historic Sites. Staff finds that it is important that we preserve the historic character of these sites. Therefore, as the historic site encompasses the entire lot and future subdivision will affect the context of the historic home, staff recommends the Planning Commission approve this plat with Condition of Approval #4 that states: Any development on this lot or future subdivided lots within this lot shall provide a transition in scale between the historic structures in this neighborhood, the Historic District, and Deer Valley Resort. The Planning Department shall review the proposed plans for compliance with the Design Guidelines for Historic Districts and Sites. This will ensure that any future development is in keeping with the historic character of this pocket neighborhood of historic houses and will allow the historic house at 632 Deer Valley Loop to become the focal point of any future project. Staff has based this condition of approval on existing language in districts neighboring the H-districts, such as the Recreation Commercial (RC) zoning district, that require development within two (2) blocks of the H-district to comply with the Design Guidelines so that they create a transition between the historic district and the resort area. The applicant is opposed to this Condition of Approval. The applicant believes staff is premature in its determination for the Condition of Approval as no development is currently proposed on the lot and any new development would likely require a future subdivision of the existing lot. Further, they argue that if the City wanted new construction to meet the Design Guidelines, then the property should have not been zoned RM. They find that the property is visually, geographically, and topographically separated from the HR-1 zoning district. The applicant¶s opposition is included as Exhibit F. Planning Commission Discussion requested. The City Engineer will also require the applicant to grant two (2) ± WHQIRRW¶VQRZ storage easements along the south (Rossie Hill) property lines to address street frontages, per Condition of Approval #5. The utilities were disconnected from this property on May 26, 1999. The City will also require the applicant to dedicate a public utilities easement to the City for the existing Planning Commission Packet June 22, 2016 Page 32 of 228 waterline that is located within the Deer Valley Loop right-of-way; this is reflected in Condition of Approval #6. A final utility plan will be required at the time of the building permit prior to any development of the site. Good Cause Staff finds good cause for this Plat Amendment as the plat amendment will create a legal lot of record from a government parcel and a portion of the Deer Valley Loop and Rossie Hill Drive rights-of-way will be dedicated to the City. Public snow storage and utility easements will also be provided on the lot. Process The approval of this plat amendment application by the City Council constitutes Final Action that may be appealed following the procedures found in LMC §15-1-18. Department Review This project has gone through an interdepartmental review. Issues raised at the review have been addressed with conditions of approval. No further issues were brought up at that time. Notice On June 8, 2016, the property was posted and notice was mailed to property owners within 300 feet. Legal notice was also published in the Park Record on June 4, 2016, according to requirements of the Land Management Code. Public Input The only public comment staff has received is in regards to the preservation of the historic house at 632 Deer Valley Loop. The neighbor wanted to make sure that the home was preserved for the future. See Exhibit H for more details. Alternatives x The Planning Commission may forward a positive recommendation to the City Council for the Lilac Hill Subdivision at 632 Deer Valley Loop as conditioned or amended; or x The Planning Commission may forward a negative recommendation to the City Council for the Lilac Hill Subdivision at 632 Deer Valley Loop and direct staff to make Findings for this decision; or x The Planning Commission may continue the discussion on the Lilac Hill Subdivision at 632 Deer Valley Loop. Significant Impacts There are no significant fiscal or environmental impacts from this application. The property is located outside the Park City Landscaping and Maintenance of Soil Cover Ordinance (Soils Ordinance) and therefore not regulated by the City for mine related impacts. If the property owner does encounter mine waste or mine waste impacted soils they must handle the material in accordance to State and Federal law. Planning Commission Packet June 22, 2016 Page 33 of 228 Consequences of not taking recommended action Consequences of not taking the Planning Department's recommendation are that the Site would remain as is and Deer Valley Loop and Rossie Hill Drive would continue to encroach on to the property. No snow storage or public utilities easements would be granted to the City. Summary Recommendation Staff recommends the Planning Commission hold a public hearing for the Lilac Hill Subdivision at 632 Deer Valley Loop and consider forwarding a positive recommendation to the City Council based on the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Conditions of Approval as found in the draft ordinance. Exhibits Exhibit A ± Draft Ordinance with Proposed Plat (Attachment 1) Exhibit B ± Survey Exhibit C ± County Tax Map Exhibit D ± $HULDO3KRWRJUDSKVZLWK¶5DGLXV Exhibit E± Site Photographs Exhibit F± Applicant¶s Opposition to Condition of Approval #4 Exhibit G± BLM Land Patent 5.2.13 Exhibit H± Public Comment Planning Commission Packet June 22, 2016 Page 34 of 228 Exhibit A ± Draft Ordinance Ordinance No. 16-XX AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE LILAC HILL SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 632 DEER VALLEY LOOP, PARK CITY, UTAH. WHEREAS, the owners of the property located at 632 Deer Valley Loop have petitioned the City Council for approval of the Plat Amendment; and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2016, the property was properly noticed and posted according to the requirements of the Land Management Code; and WHEREAS, on June 4, 2016, proper legal notice was sent to all affected property owners; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 22, 2016, to receive input on plat amendment; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, on June 22, 2016, forwarded a _____ recommendation to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, on July 14, 2016, the City Council held a public hearing to receive input on the plat amendment; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of Park City, Utah to approve the Lilac Hill Subdivision located at 632 Deer Valley Loop. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of Park City, Utah as follows: SECTION 1. APPROVAL.The Lilac Hill Subdivision located at 632 Deer Valley Loop, as shown in Attachment 1, is approved subject to the following Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law, and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. The property is located at 632 Deer Valley Loop. 2. The property is in the Residential Medium (RM) zoning district. 3. The subject property consists of all of Government Lot 26 in Section 15, Township 2 South, Range 4 East, Salt Lake Base and Meridian. It was formerly known as the 11th House on the south side of Deer Valley, Park City. The proposed plat amendment creates one (1) lot of record. 4.7KLVVLWHLVOLVWHGRQ3DUN&LW\¶V+LVWRULF6LWHV,QYHQWRU\+6,DQGLVGHVLJQDWHGDV Significant. Planning Commission Packet June 22, 2016 Page 35 of 228 5. The Plat Amendment creates a legal lot of record from the government lot. 6. The proposed Plat Amendment combines the property into one (1) lot measuring 14,319 square feet. 7. A single-family dwelling is an allowed use in the District. 8. The minimum lot area for a single-family dwelling is 2,812 square feet. The proposed lot meets the minimum lot area for single-family dwellings. 9. The proposed lot width is width is 116.38 feet along the north property line (facing Deer Valley Drive) and 129.41 feet along the south property line (Rossie Hill). 10. The minimum lot width required is 37.50 feet. The proposed lot meets the minimum lot width requirement. 11. LMC § 15-2.2-4 indicates that historic structures that do not comply with building setbacks are valid complying structures. 12. The minimum front yard setbacks are fifteen feet (15¶ and rear yard setbacks are 10 feet. The historic house has a front yard setback of 35 feet and rear yard setback of 52 feet. 13.7KHPLQLPXPVLGH\DUGVHWEDFNVDUHILYHIHHW¶. The historic house has a side yard setback of 17 feet on the west and 65 feet on the east. 14. Deer Valley Loop consumes 64.27 square feet of the northwest corner of the lot and Rossie Hill Drive consumes 62.72 square feet of the southeast corner of the lot. 15. All findings within the Analysis section and the recitals above are incorporated herein as findings of fact. Conclusions of Law: 1. There is good cause for this Subdivision. 2. The Plat Amendment is consistent with the Park City Land Management Code and applicable State law regarding lot combinations. 3. Neither the public nor any person will be materially injured by the proposed Plat Amendment. 4. Approval of the Plat Amendment, subject to the conditions stated below, does not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Park City. Conditions of Approval: 1. The City Planner, City Attorney, and City Engineer will review and approve the final form and content of the plat for compliance with State law, the Land Management Code, and the conditions of approval, prior to recordation of the plat. 2. The applicant will record the plat at the County within one year from the date of City &RXQFLODSSURYDO,IUHFRUGDWLRQKDVQRWRFFXUUHGZLWKLQRQH\HDUV¶WLPHWKLV approval for the plat will be void, unless a request for an extension is made in writing prior to the expiration date and an extension is granted by the City Council. 3. The applicant shall dedicate a portion of the property that consists of Deer Valley Loop and Rossie Hill Drive to the City as part of this plat amendment. 4. Any development on this lot or future subdivided lots within this lot shall provide a transition in scale between the historic structures in this neighborhood, the Historic District, and Deer Valley Resort. The Planning Department shall review the proposed plans for compliance with the Design Guidelines for Historic Districts and Sites. Planning Commission Packet June 22, 2016 Page 36 of 228 5. A ten foot ¶ZLGHSXEOLFVQRZVWRUDJHHDVHPHQWZLOOEHUHTXLUHGDORQJWKHRossie Hill frontage of the property. 6. A public utilities easement is required along Deer Valley Loop for the existing water line and shall be indicated on the final plat. 7. The property is located outside the Park City Landscaping and Maintenance of Soil Cover Ordinance (Soils Ordinance) and therefore not regulated by the City for mine related impacts. If the property owner does encounter mine waste or mine waste impacted soils they must handle the material in accordance to State and Federal law. 8. Modified 13-D sprinklers will be required for new construction by the Chief Building Official at the time of review of the building permit submittal and shall be noted on the final Mylar prior to recordation. 9. New construction shall comply with Land Management Code Section 15-2.15-3 regarding setbacks, building height, building envelope, building footprint, etc. SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of July, 2016. PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ________________________________ Jack Thomas, MAYOR ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Recorder APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ Mark Harrington, City Attorney Attachment 1 ± Proposed Plat Planning Commission Packet June 22, 2016 Page 37 of 228 Planning Commission Packet June 22, 2016 Page 38 of 228 Exhibit A Exhibit B Planning Commission Packet June 22, 2016 Page 39 of 228 Exhibit C Planning Commission Packet June 22, 2016 Page 40 of 228 Exhibit D Planning Commission Packet June 22, 2016 Page 41 of 228 Exhibit E Planning Commission Packet June 22, 2016 Page 42 of 228 Planning Commission Packet June 22, 2016 Page 43 of 228 Planning Commission Packet June 22, 2016 Page 44 of 228 Planning Commission Packet June 22, 2016 Page 45 of 228 Wednesday, June 15, 2016 Anya Grahn Park City Planning Department RE: Plat Amendment PL-15-03010 632 Deer Valley Drive Anya, We understand you would like to place a Condition of Approval on Lilac Hill Plat requiring any and all future development be subject to the HDDR Design Guidelines, due to the property being located within "within a two (2) Block radius of the HR-1 District" (from the RC Zone Code - 15-2.16-7 Architectural Review). We are Opposed to this Condition of Approval for the following reasons: 1. This seems premature as the current application does not contemplate development of the site: a) any construction which attempts to attach to the historic structure would be subject to HDDR Approval because of the home being a designated Historic Site. b) Any construction attempted that does not attached to the Historic home would need be built upon a new lot, necessitating a Subdivision application, which would be the proper time to deal with this issue; though the points below show that HDDR Approval is being improperly applied to the RM Zone. 2. If the City would like the language from the RC Zone to apply to the RM Zone, why isn’t it included within the RM Zone code language? Which other Zones in Park City are Subject to RC Zone Code - 15-2.16-7 Architectural Review? 2. The code referenced in this Condition Of Approval (15-2.16-7 Architectural Review) that creates the “2 Block” standard is for the RC Zone, not the RM Zone, which the property is within. Applying Code from other Zones would create a precedent that would require property owners in one Zone to potentially adhere to randomly chosen sections from another Zone, which may or may not even be contiguous to their Zone. 3. The Land Management Code 15-15-1.31 deﬁnes a block as "BLOCK. A tract of land bounded by Streets, or by a combination of Streets and public parks, cemeteries, railroad Rights-of-Way, shore lines of waterways, or City boundary lines, as shown on an ofﬁcial plat.” Therefore a “BLOCK” could be multiple sizes and the nearest and largest BLOCK wouldn’t project 2X towards Lilac Hill. See Attached image. 4. The Property is visually, geographically, and topographically separated from the nearest portion of the HR-1. There are numerous modern/contemporary or newly built homes and condominiums separating this parcel from any portion of HR-1 and a person leaving the the Planning Commission Packet June 22, 2016 Page 46 of 228 Exhibit F HR-1 district headed toward Lilac Hill cannot get there without passing by 10-15 non-historic properties that are also not in a HR Zone. Matt Mullin 632 DV Loop, LLC Planning Commission Packet June 22, 2016 Page 47 of 228 SerialNo.UTU-52468 00969304 B: 2183 P: 1779 Page 1of2 Alan Spriggs,Summit county Utah Recorder 05/02/2013 03:09:29 PM Fee $12.00 By High Country Title ElectronicallyRecorded 51)Wniteb States of 5merica to alltoidjamtf)esepresentsshallcome,keetfugs: WHEREAS, William T.Bertagnole and JulfM.Bertagnole, As Trustees of the JuliM.Bertagnole Family Trust dated September 7,2005 areentitledto a land patentpursuant to the Act of December 22, 1928, as amended (43.U.S.C. 1068-1068b),forthe followingdescribedland: SaltLake Meridian,Utah T. 2 S.,R.4 E., Sec.15,lot26. Containing .33acre,more orless. NOW KNOW YE,thatthereis,therefore,grantedby theUNITED STATES unto William T.. Bertagnole and JuliM.Bertagnole,Trustees,the lands describedabove;TO HAVE AND TO HOLD theland with allthe rights,privileges,immunities,and appurtenances,of whatsoever nature,thereuntobelonging,unto William T.Bertagnole and JuliM.Bertagnole,Trustees,and to theirsuccessorsand assigns,forever. EXCEPTING AND RESERVING TO THE UNITED STATES: 1.A right-of-way thereon for ditches or canals constructedby the authorityof the United States.Act of August 30,1890 (43 U.S.C.945). 2. All mineral depositsinthe land so patented,and to it,or persons authorizedby it,the rightto prospectfor,mine and remove such depositsfrom the same under applicable law. PatentNo.43-20 13-000 1 Page1of2Planning Commission Packet June 22, 2016 Page 48 of 228 Exhibit G SUBJECT TO: 1. Those rights for a road granted to Park City Municipal Corporation,its successorsor assigns,by Right-ofWay No.UTU-45920,pursuant to the Act of October 21,1976 (43 U.S.C.1761). By acceptingthispatent,patenteesagreeto indenmify,defend,and hold thegrantorharmless from any costs,damages,claims,liabilities,and judgments arisingfrom past,present,and futureactsor omissions of thepatentees,theiremployees, agents,contractors,lessees,or any thirdpartyarisingout of or in connectionwith patentees'use,occupancy,or operationson thepatentedrealproperty.This indemnificationand hold harmless agreement includes,but isnot limitedto,actsand omissions ofthepatentees,theiremployees,agents,contractors, lessees,or any thirdparty,arisingout of orin connectionwith theuse and/or occupancy on thepatentedrealpropertywhich has alreadyresultedor does hereafterresultin:(1) Violationsof federal,state,and locallaws and regulationswhich arenow,or may inthe futurebecome,applicabletothepatentedrealproperty;(2)Judgments,claims,or demands assessedagainstthe grantor;(3)Costs,expenses,or damages incurredby theUnited States; (4)Releases or threatenedreleaseson or intoland,propertyand otherinterestsof the grantor by solidwaste and/orhazardous substances(s)as definedby federalor stateenvironmental laws;(5)Other activitiesby which solidorhazardous substancesor wastes,as defined by federaland stateenvironmental laws were generated,released,stored,used or otherwise disposed on thepatented realproperty,and any clean-upresponse,naturalresourcedamage, or otheractionsrelatedin any manner to saidsolidor hazardous substancesor wastes. This covenant shallbe construed asrunning with the patentedrealproperty,and may be enforced by the United Statesina courtof competent jurisdiction. INTESTIMONY WHEREOF,theundersignedauthorizedofficerof theBureauofLandManagement,inaccordancewiththeprovisionsoftheActofJune17,1948(62Stat.476),has,inthenameofthe unitedstates,causedtheseletterstobemaderatent,andtheseat oftheBureautobehereuntoaffixed. Give undermy hand,insaltLakecity,utah.theso*dayof AprilintheyearofourLordtwothousandandthirteenandthe Independenceoftheunitedstatesthetwohundredandthirty- Deputy StateDirector, Division of Lands and Minerals Bureau of Land Management 00969304 Page 2 of 2 Summit county PatentNo.43-2013-0001 Page2 of2 Planning Commission Packet June 22, 2016 Page 49 of 228 1 Anya Grahn From:Sydney Reed <sydreed@msn.com> Sent:Saturday, June 11, 2016 10:41 AM To:Jennifer Strauss Gurss; Matey Erdos; Diane Bernhardt; Jeff Camp; jennifer@jeffcamp.com; Matt Shier; Christina Shiebler; John and Linda Mason; Mary Wintzer; Morgan Hole; Howard Klein; Dennis Wong; Bob Gurss; Anya Grahn Subject:Re: Rossie Hill Update Attachments:Mullin property.pdf ThanksfortheupdateJennifer. Mymainconcernisthatthathomebuiltin1916ispreservedtoreflectourheritage. Ithasbeenpoorlymaintainedinthehopesitwouldnothavetobesaved. Ifeelitisimperativethathomemaintainit'sintegrity. Irememberthefamilythatownedthathome.Theyweremeticulousabouttheirlilacbushes,peonyplants andyard.Theirhomealwayswaskeptwell,theyraisedtheirchildrenthereandhadagoodlifeinParkCity. ThatistheneighborhoodwemovedintoandIfeelstronglyweneedtomaintainvestigesofthatlifeforever. SydneyReed 668CoalitionViewCt. From:JenniferStraussGurss<straussgurss@gmail.com> Sent:Friday,June10,20167:40PM To:SydneyReed;MateyErdos;DianeBernhardt;JeffCamp;jennifer@jeffcamp.com;MattShier;ChristinaShiebler;John andLindaMason;MaryWintzer;MorganHole;HowardKlein;DennisWong;BobGurss Subject:RossieHillUpdate I'm90%sureyoueachgotacopyoftheattachedletter,indicatingupcomingPlanningCommissionandCity Councilmeetings(June22andJuly14,respectively)regardingaplatamendmentforthepropertyonthenorth sideofRossieHill.However,sinceourswasaddressedtothecondoassociation,IthoughtI'dmakesure everyoneisinthe(deervalley)loop.... Notquitesurewhatthenextstepis,orevenwhatconstitutesGovernmentLot26.... Planning Commission Packet June 22, 2016 Page 50 of 228 Exhibit H